Another LDS Apologist Concedes No Conclusive Evidence for Book of Mormon Historicity

Another noted LDS apologist, researcher and author, Brant A. Gardner, has likewise conceded that there is no conclusive evidence for the historicity of the Book of Mormon. On a comment thread at the Interpreter’s website, Gardner freely admitted that no conclusive evidence has been discovered that would definitively show that the Book of Mormon is a historical account of real events and people.

There is not conclusive proof, but there is evidence which has been sufficient for many to accept the hypothesis.”

“There is a lot of evidence, and for those of us who work with that evidence, the cumulation is becoming impressive. None of it is conclusive–but again so little is.”

There is a lot of evidence, or supposed evidence, for Big Foot and Nessie, but no matter how large that mountain of evidence grows, no one in their right mind is going to accept the hypothesis that Big Foot or Nessie are real without some sort of evidence that borders on certainty—DNA, clear photographs, direct video surveillance, large numbers of sightings, remains that can be forensically studied, many footprints, capture, or the ability to see it first-hand. In the meantime, Big Foot and Nessie remain fanciful ideas in the minds of a few, but hardly objective realities. (Is it telling that many Mormons apparently believe in Big Foot?)

Furthermore, and more intriguingly, Gardner notes that not only is there no conclusive evidence for the Book of Mormon, but it is unlikely that it even exists, for many reasons:

“There is much that we do and believe (religion aside) that is based on evidence rather than conclusive proof.”

“As for writing being found, it is cause for celebration when any new text is found in Mesoamerica because they are pretty rare.”

“The painted texts such as those found in San Bartolo only serve to show us how much was lost.”

“Again, there is a difference between evidence and conclusive proof. There is so little conclusive proof about much.”

“I wouldn’t say that we would never find anything with a Book of Mormon name, but I think it unlikely simply because of the problems of preservation. The corpus of texts from Book of Mormon times is significantly smaller than those from post-Book of Mormon times.”

“The problem is the idea of conclusive evidence. There really isn’t a lot of it for any historical fact during that time period.”

I doubt that conclusive proof is available–but good evidence is. Good evidence is sufficient for many hypotheses.”

“Conclusive proof is typically beyond most questions about antiquity. Given that it is so rare, I doubt that there will be any for the Book of Mormon. Even very good information is likely to be dismissed as coincidental.”

As I noted in my last blog post, when there is not conclusive evidence for something, it is a matter of faith. It is not history, it is not objective fact, it is not science. It may be plausible, it may be hypothetical or theoretical, but it cannot be objective truth in any sense of the term.

Do I doubt the Church’s teachings on the Book of Mormon? I do.


2 thoughts on “Another LDS Apologist Concedes No Conclusive Evidence for Book of Mormon Historicity

  1. Ugh, I don’t know why you write anything…. There are so many better sites than this…. Just save your time…

    But bracketing whether the BOM is true…(whatever true actually means), there are a lot of things historians believe that cannot be conclusively proven true based on your standard.

    Plus, I find your whole concluding paragraph schtick really corny…


  2. There is so much that mesoamericanist take on faith based on evidence, but not conclusive evidence.

    Now bracketing the historicity of the BOM, your understanding of how history works is weak.

    Look at what Egyptologist believed in the 50s compared to today??? Huge changes in belief… And I guess if you asked many Egyptologist there are many things that they believe but they doubt will ever be proven.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s